Bond Papers

Bond Papers

Share this post

Bond Papers
Bond Papers
Academy of the Absurd
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Academy of the Absurd

GCU BEPs try to put "I" in BIPOC

Edward Hollett's avatar
Edward Hollett
Apr 10, 2024
∙ Paid
2

Share this post

Bond Papers
Bond Papers
Academy of the Absurd
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

In the wake of the Vianne Timmons scandal, her backers in Generic Canadian University’s top bureaucracy promised to fix things, as bureaucrats, enablers, and other perpetrators do when they’ve been caught out.

They promised to hire an outside consultant who would help them find a sure-fire test of race - that is really what “Indigenous identity” is - that would not rely on a person saying they were or implying they were an Indigenous person. That’s known as self-identification.

The university BEP in charge of this dodge didn’t use those words. She used the modern bureaucratic dialect:

“The scope of the work is essentially to conduct engagement sessions or consultations with groups throughout the province, but also internal to the university with Indigenous students, faculty, and staff. That will help guide us toward the development of a policy around Indigenous verification."

The italics are the more nakedly bureaucratic bits. The bolded bits point to who they are talking with.

The bolded and italicised words are the goal, which is singularly modern, Canadian, and bureaucratic in that it aims to have some machine that university officials can waive over someone to pronounce their racial identity is officially approved. Think of it as a cross between a tricorder from Star Trek and the RCMP’s “fruit machine” from the 1950s but without the moral integrity of Star Trek’s attitude to idiotic concepts like race yet with all of the immorality and stupidity of the Mountie’s efforts to find some fool-proof way to spot the cops at the time called “fags” and “queers” within the federal government.

Like the self-licking ice cream cone, the GCU BEP’s game is a self-lampooning absurdity.


The *really* inconvenient "Indians"

Edward Hollett
·
April 5, 2024
The *really* inconvenient "Indians"

There’s a Newfoundland law that might still be in force. It dates from before 1916 and makes it illegal for anyone to take an Inuit or Innu person from Labrador to display in an exhibit without the prior approval of Cabinet. Across North America and in Europe in the 1800s, traveling shows displayed people from the around the world who were considered exotic or different from the locals. They were especially popular in Germany well into the 1920s and in both Canada and the United States, spectacles and circuses like

Read full story

This isn’t my full-time job but for nearly 20 years I’ve provided information and analysis you cannot get anywhere else. If you like different opinions and ideas - especially if you don’t agree with them - then please become a paying subscriber.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Bond Papers to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Edward G. Hollett
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More